New Scientist Article

This article shows the stats that having older brothers increases the odds of being homosexual, indicating that it is a social defect. However, they also point out that non-biological brothers don't have the same effect and draw conclusions from this stat.

This is erroneous because of the usual time during which people grow up in foster care and the social differences of being a foster child and naturally born into your family. Only the number of biological older brothers affects the statistic.

I'd like to point out the early age these effects occur at, and the formative perceptional sexually shaping experiences at these ages. Even if the person was born and with their family for 6 months it would affect their outlook, experience, and expression later in life.

Family treat one another and feel differently based on whether they are foster children or natural. Foster and transitional experiences may affect this. The study really cannot be sured up without recognizing these factors. Furthermore, this appears suspiciously like a disindividation of human experiences. Healthy and properly wired and formed sexual centers and experience are uniformly Biblical in ethics.